Security Overview of Cryptocurrency Trading Media and Processes

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2024.03.001

Abstract

Abstract:

The decentralized cryptocurrency, formed by blockchain technology and cryptography, has been facing an increasing number of security attacks. Research on ensuring the security of cryptocurrency transactions has become a hot topic. The cryptocurrency as a medium of exchange and the encrypted wallets used for custody have become the focus of security research. Various key management and detection technologies have been developed to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the encrypted wallets. At the same time, researchers have also proposed corresponding detection and prevention strategies for security vulnerabilities and attack methods in centralized and decentralized exchanges. Additionally, potential attack types, detection techniques, and defense measures in cryptocurrency transactions have been comprehensively reviewed. Finally, a summary of the security of cryptocurrency transactions is provided, along with a forward-looking discussion on future development directions.

Key words: cryptocurrency, crypto wallet, cryptocurrency exchange, smart contract, transaction process security

CLC Number:

TP309

LIU Feng, JIANG Jiaqi, HUANG Hao. Security Overview of Cryptocurrency Trading Media and Processes[J]. Netinfo Security, 2024, 24(3): 330-351.

Figures/Tables 13

References 109

[1]	NAKAMOTO S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System[EB/OL]. (2008-10-31)[2023-09-10]. https://grothoff.org/christian/teaching/2014/2194/bitcoin.pdf.
[2]	LI Yannan, SUSILO W, YANG Guomin, et al. Toward Privacy and Regulation in Blockchain-Based Cryptocurrencies[J]. IEEE Network, 2019, 33(5): 111-117. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2019.1800271
[3]	SHIH D, WU Tingwei, HSU T H, et al. Verification of Cryptocurrency Mining Using Ethereum[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 120351-120360. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 URL
[4]	HE Daojing, LI Shihao, LI Cong, et al. Security Analysis of Cryptocurrency Wallets in Android-Based Applications[J]. IEEE Network, 2020, 34(6): 114-119.
[5]	LI Cong, HE Daojing, LI Shihao, et al. Android-Based Cryptocurrency Wallets: Attacks and Countermeasures[C]// IEEE. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Blockchain. New York: IEEE, 2020: 9-16.
[6]	VOLETY T, SAINI S, MCGHIN T, et al. Cracking Bitcoin Wallets: I Want What You Have in the Wallets[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 91(2): 136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.08.029 URL
[7]	KIKTENKO E O, KUDINOV M A, FEDOROV A K. Detecting Brute-Force Attacks on Cryptocurrency Wallets[C]// University of Seville. 22nd International Conference on Business Information Systems. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019: 232-242.
[8]	BIRYUKOV A, TIKHOMIROV S. Security and Privacy of Mobile Wallet Users in Bitcoin, Dash, Monero, and Zcash[J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2019(10): 59-71.
[9]	LIU Zhen, YANG Guomin, WONG D S, et al. Secure Deterministic Wallet and Stealth Address: Key-Insulated and Privacy-Preserving Signature Scheme with Publicly Derived Public Key[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2022, 19(5): 2934-2951. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2021.3078463 URL
[10]	BACK H, OH J, KIM C, et al. A Model for Detecting Cryptocurrency Transactions with Discernible Purpose[C]// IEEE. 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks. New York: IEEE, 2019: 713-717.
[11]	HE Xiaojian, LIN Jinfu, LI Kangzi, et al. A Novel Cryptocurrency Wallet Management Scheme Based on Decentralized Multi-Constrained Derangement[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 185250-185263. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961183
[12]	SHBAIR W M, GAVRILOV E, STATE R. HSM-Based Key Management Solution for Ethereum Blockchain[C]// IEEE. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. New York: IEEE, 2021: 1-3.
[13]	PRAITHEESHAN P, PAN L, DOSS R. Security Evaluation of Smart Contract-Based On-Chain Ethereum Wallets[C]// University of Seville. 14th International Conference on Network and System Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2020: 22-41.
[14]	CHEN Jialan, LIN Dan, WU Jiajing. Do Cryptocurrency Exchanges Fake Trading Volumes? An Empirical Analysis of Wash Trading Based on Data Mining[J]. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 586: 126405-126418. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126405 URL
[15]	VICTOR F, WEINTRAUD A M. Detecting and Quantifying Wash Trading on Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges[C]// ACM. 30th World Wide Web Conference. New York: ACM, 2021: 23-32.
[16]	OOSTHOEK K, DOERR C. From Hodl to Heist: Analysis of Cyber Security Threats to Bitcoin Exchanges[C]// IEEE. IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. New York: IEEE, 2020: 1-9.
[17]	OOSTHOEK K, DOERR C. Cyber Security Threats to Bitcoin Exchanges: Adversary Exploitation and Laundering Techniques[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2021, 18(2): 1616-1628. doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3046145 URL
[18]	BENTOV I, JI Yan, ZHANG Fan, et al. Tesseract: Real-Time Cryptocurrency Exchange Using Trusted Hardware[C]// ACM. ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2019: 1521-1538.
[19]	BUTERIN V. Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform[EB/OL]. (2014-01-21)[2023-10-10]. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper.
[20]	LU Ning, WANG Bin, ZHANG Yongxin, et al. NeuCheck: A More Practical Ethereum Smart Contract Security Analysis Tool[J]. Software-Practice & Experience, 2021, 51(10): 2065-2084.
[21]	XIA Pengcheng, WANG Haoyu, GAO Bingyu, et al. Trade or Trick? Detecting and Characterizing Scam Tokens on Uniswap Decentralized Exchange[C]// ACM. ACM SIGMETRICS/Performance Conference. New York: ACM, 2022: 23-49.
[22]	JI S, KIM D, IM H. Evaluating Countermeasures for Verifying the Integrity of Ethereum Smart Contract Applications[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 90029-90042. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091317 URL
[23]	SOUSA JOSE E A, OLIVEIRA V C, ALMEIDA VALADARES J, et al. Fighting Under-Price DoS Attack in Ethereum with Machine Learning Techniques[J]. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 2021, 48(4): 24-37.
[24]	CHINEN Y, YANAI N, CRUZ J P, et al. RA: Hunting for Re-Entrancy Attacks in Ethereum Smart Contracts via Static Analysis[C]// IEEE. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Blockchain. New York: IEEE, 2020: 327-336.
[25]	LEE S, CHO E S. Lightweight Extension of an Execution Environment for Safer Function Calls in Solidity/Ethereum Virtual Machine Smart Contracts[C]// IEEE. 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering. New York: IEEE, 2021: 689-695.
[26]	GAO Jianbo, LIU Han, LIU Chao, et al. EASYFLOW: Keep Ethereum Away from Overflow[C]// IEEE. IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering-Software Engineering in Practice. New York: IEEE, 2019: 23-26.
[27]	AQUILINA S J, CASINO F, VELLA M, et al. EtherClue: Digital Investigation of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts[J]. Blockchain-Research and Applications, 2021, 2(4): 1016-1029.
[28]	MAVRIDOU A, LASZKA A, STACHTIARI E, et al. VeriSolid: Correct-by-Design Smart Contracts for Ethereum[C]// University of Seville. 23rd International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019: 446-465.
[29]	IVANOV N, LOU J, CHEN Ting, et al. Targeting the Weakest Link: Social Engineering Attacks in Ethereum Smart Contracts[C]// ACM. 16th ACM ASIA Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2021: 787-801.
[30]	CAMINO R D, TORRES C F, BADEN M, et al. A Data Science Approach for Detecting Honeypots in Ethereum[C]// IEEE. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. New York: IEEE, 2020: 1-9.
[31]	HARA K, TAKAHASHI T, ISHIMAKI M, et al. Machine-Learning Approach Using Solidity Bytecode for Smart-Contract Honeypot Detection in the Ethereum[C]// IEEE. 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security. New York: IEEE, 2021: 652-659.
[32]	HARA K, SATO T, IMAMURA M, et al. Profiling of Malicious Users Using Simple Honeypots on the Ethereum Blockchain Network[C]// IEEE. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. New York: IEEE, 2020: 1-3.
[33]	CHENG Zhen, HOU Xinrui, LI Runhuai, et al. Towards a First Step to Understand the Cryptocurrency Stealing Attack on Ethereum[C]// USENIX. 22nd International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses. Berkeley: USENIX, 2019: 47-60.
[34]	ZHANG Lingyue, LI Huilin, LI Yannan, et al. An Efficient Linkable Group Signature for Payer Tracing in Anonymous Cryptocurrencies[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 101: 29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.05.081
[35]	LIN Chao, HE Debiao, HUANG Xinyi, et al. DCAP: A Secure and Efficient Decentralized Conditional Anonymous Payment System Based on Blockchain[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2020, 15: 2440-2452. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.10206 URL
[36]	YIN HAO, LANGENHELDT K C, HARLEV M A, et al. Regulating Cryptocurrencies: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to De-Anonymizing the Bitcoin Blockchain[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2019, 36(1): 37-73. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2018.1550550 URL
[37]	OLA F, EGUIMENDIA M, BRUSE J L, et al. Cascading Machine Learning to Attack Bitcoin Anonymity[C]// IEEE. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Blockchain. New York: IEEE, 2019: 10-17.
[38]	ZHANG Yuhang, WANG Jun, LUO Jie. Heuristic-Based Address Clustering in Bitcoin[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 210582-210591. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 URL
[39]	BIRYUKOV A, TIKHOMIROV S. Deanonymization and Linkability of Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on Network Analysis[C]// IEEE. 4th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2019: 172-184.
[40]	BIRYUKOV A, TIKHOMIROV S. Transaction Clustering Using Network Traffic Analysis for Bitcoin and Derived Blockchains[C]// IEEE. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. New York: IEEE, 2019: 204-209.
[41]	ZHANG Zongyang, YIN Jiayuan, LIU Yizhong, et al. Deanonymization of Litecoin through Transaction-Linkage Attacks[C]// IEEE. 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems. New York: IEEE, 2020: 59-65.
[42]	KARA I, AYDOS M. Cyber Fraud: Detection and Analysis of the Crypto-Ransomware[C]// IEEE. 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference. New York: IEEE, 2020: 764-769.
[43]	ZHENG Rui, WANG Qiuyun, LIN Zhuopang, et al. Cryptocurrency Malware Detection in Real-World Environment: Based on Multi-Results Stacking Learning[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 124: 109044-109058. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109044 URL
[44]	KHARRAZ A, MA Z, MURLEY P, et al. OUTGUARD: Detecting In-Browser Covert Cryptocurrency Mining in the Wild[C]// ACM. World Wide Web Conference. New York: ACM, 2019: 840-852.
[45]	NING Rui, WANG Cong, XIN Chunsheng, et al. CapJack: Capture In-Browser Crypto-Jacking by Deep Capsule Network through Behavioral Analysis[C]// IEEE. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. New York: IEEE, 2019: 1873-1881.
[46]	TAHIR R, DURRANI S, AHMED F, et al. The Browsers Strike Back: Countering Cryptojacking and Parasitic Miners on the Web[C]// IEEE. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. New York: IEEE, 2019: 703-711.
[47]	RAZALI M A, MOHD S S. CMBlock: In-Browser Detection and Prevention Cryptojacking Tool Using Blacklist and Behavior-Based Detection Method[C]// University of Seville. 6th International Visual Informatics Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019: 404-414.
[48]	TANANA D. Behavior-Based Detection of Cryptojacking Malware[C]// IEEE. 2020 Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology. New York: IEEE, 2020: 543-556.
[49]	LACHTAR N, ELKHAIL A A, BACHA A, et al. A Cross-Stack Approach Towards Defending against Cryptojacking[J]. IEEE Computer Architecture Letters, 2020, 19(2): 126-129. doi: 10.1109/CA-L.10208 URL
[50]	LACHTAR N, ELKHAIL A A, BACHA A, et al. An Application Agnostic Defense against the Dark Arts of Cryptojacking[C]// IEEE. 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. New York: IEEE, 2021: 314-325.
[51]	HERNANDEZ-SUAREZ A, SANCHEZ-PEREZ G, TOSCANO-MEDINA L K, et al. Detecting Cryptojacking Web Threats: An Approach with Autoencoders and Deep Dense Neural Networks[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2022, 12(7): 3234-3245.
[52]	YING Qianjin, YU Yulei, TIAN Donghai, et al. CJSpector: A Novel Cryptojacking Detection Method Using Hardware Trace and Deep Learning[J]. Journal of Grid Computing, 2022, 20(3): 31-48. doi: 10.1007/s10723-022-09621-2
[53]	CAO Chuanbo, GUO Chun, SHEN Guowei, et al. Cryptomining Malware Early Detection Method in Behavioral Diversity Period[J]. ACTC Electronica Sinica, 2023, 51(7): 1850-1858.
	曹传博, 郭春, 申国伟, 等. 面向行为多样期的挖矿恶意软件早期检测方法[J]. 电子学报, 2023, 51(7): 1850-1858. doi: 10.12263/DZXB.20220926
[54]	ZIMBA A, WANG Zhaoshun, MULENGA M. Cryptojacking Injection: A Paradigm Shift to Cryptocurrency-Based Web-Centric Internet Attacks[J]. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2019, 29(1): 40-59. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2019.1552747 URL
[55]	DI T G, NGO C N. Are You a Favorite Target For Cryptojacking? A Case-Control Study on The Cryptojacking Ecosystem[C]// IEEE. 5th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2020: 515-520.
[56]	CHEN Weili, XU Yuejin, ZHENG Zibin, et al. Detecting Pump & Dump Schemes on Cryptocurrency Market Using an Improved Apriori Algorithm[C]// IEEE. 13th IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)/ 10th International Workshop on Joint Cloud Computing (JCC)/ IEEE International Workshop on Cloud Computing in Robotic Systems. New York: IEEE, 2019: 293-298.
[57]	MIRTAHERI M, ABU-EL-HAIJA S, MORSTATTER F, et al. Identifying and Analyzing Cryptocurrency Manipulations in Social Media[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 8(3): 607-617. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2021.3059286 URL
[58]	XU Jiahua, LIVSHITS Benjamin. The Anatomy of a Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Scheme[C]// USENIX. 28th USENIX Security Symposium. Berkeley: USENIX, 2019: 1609-1622.
[59]	NIZZOLI L, TARDELLI S, AVVENUTI M, et al. Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulation[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 113230-113245. doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 URL
[60]	HAMRICK J T, ROUHI F, MUKHERJEE A K, et al. An Examination of the Cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump Ecosystem[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2021, 58(4): 102506-102518. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102506 URL
[61]	PHILLIPS ROSS C, GORSE D. Predicting Cryptocurrency Price Bubbles Using Social Media Data and Epidemic Modelling[C]// IEEE. IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. New York: IEEE, 2017: 394-400.
[62]	SHU Min, ZHU Wei. Real-Time Prediction of Bitcoin Bubble Crashes[J]. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 548: 124477-124489. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124477 URL
[63]	WEN Tingke, XIAO Yuanxing, WANG Anqi, et al. A Novel Hybrid Feature Fusion Model for Detecting Phishing Scam on Ethereum Using Deep Neural Network[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 211: 118463-118473. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118463 URL
[64]	LI Jinghao, LI Hexiao, CHENG Na, et al. Multi-Channel Walk Embedding Based Ethereum Phishing Scam Detection Method[C]// IEEE. IEEE 28th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems. New York: IEEE, 2023: 289-295.
[65]	WU Jiajing, YUAN Qi, LIN Dan, et al. Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embedding[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems, 2022, 52(2): 1156-1166. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3016821 URL
[66]	WANG Lei, XU Ming, CHENG Hao. Phishing Scams Detection via Temporal Graph Attention Network in Ethereum[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2023, 60(4): 103412-103421. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103412 URL
[67]	CHEN Weili, GUO Xiongfeng, CHEN Zhiguang, et al. Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum: Towards Financial Security for Blockchain Ecosystem[J]. IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020: 4506-4512.
[68]	WAN Yun, XIAO Feng. Early-Stage Phishing Detection on the Ethereum Transaction Network[J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 27(7): 3707-3719. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07661-0
[69]	TANG Junjing, ZHAO Gansen, ZOU Bangqi. Semi-Supervised Graph Convolutional Network for Ethereum Phishing Scam Recognition[C]// Xiamen University. 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Communication; Network and Computer Technology (ECNCT). Bellingham: SPIE-INT SOC Optical Engineering, 2021: 12167-12181.
[70]	CHEN Liang, PENG Jiaying, LIU Yang, et al. Phishing Scams Detection in Ethereum Transaction Network[J]. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 2021, 21(1): 1-16.
[71]	BADAWI E, JOURDAN G, BOCHMANN G, et al. An Automatic Detection and Analysis of the Bitcoin Generator Scam[C]// IEEE. 5th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2020: 407-416.
[72]	YU Shanqing, JIN Jie, XIE Yunyi, et al. Ponzi Scheme Detection in Ethereum Transaction Network[J]. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2021: 175-186.
[73]	SAYEED S, MARCO-GISBERT H. Assessing Blockchain Consensus and Security Mechanisms against the 51% Attack[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(9): 1788-1798. doi: 10.3390/app9091788 URL
[74]	GUPTA K D, RAHMAN A, POUDYAL S, et al. A Hybrid POW-POS Implementation against 51 Percent Attack in Cryptocurrency System[C]// IEEE. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science. New York: IEEE, 2019: 396-403.
[75]	SUHYEON L, SEUNGJOO K. Proof-of-Stake at Stake:Predatory, Destructive Attack on PoS Cryptocurrencies[C]// ACM. 3rd Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems. New York: ACM, 2020: 7-11.
[76]	WANG Qiuhua, XIA Tianyu, WANG Dong, et al. Sdos: Selfish Mining-Based Denial-of-Service Attack[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2022, 17: 3335-3349. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3202696 URL
[77]	ROSENFELD M. Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems[EB/OL]. (2011-12-22)[2023-09-03]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980.pdf.
[78]	SHI Hongwei, WANG Shengling, HU Qin, et al. Fee-Free Pooled Mining for Countering Pool-Hopping Attack in Blockchain[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2021, 18(4): 1580-1590.
[79]	TRAN M, CHOI I, MOON G J, et al. A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer Network[C]// IEEE. 41st IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2020: 894-909.
[80]	FAN Wenjun, CHANG S Y, ZHOU Xiaobo, et al. ConMan: A Connection Manipulation-Based Attack against Bitcoin Networking[C]// IEEE. IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security. New York: IEEE, 2021: 101-109.
[81]	PERAZZO P, ARENA A, DINI G. An Analysis of Routing Attacks against IOTA Cryptocurrency[C]// IEEE. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Blockchain. New York: IEEE, 2020: 517-524.
[82]	MATZUTT R, HILLER J, HENZE M, et al. A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content on Bitcoin[C]// Springer. 22nd International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2018: 420-438.
[83]	SATO T, IMAMURA M, OMOTE K. Threat Analysis of Poisoning Attack against Ethereum Blockchain[C]// Springer. Information Security Theory and Practice International Conference. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019: 139-154.
[84]	RAJPUT U, ABBAS F, HUSSAIN R, et al. A Simple Yet Efficient Approach to Combat Transaction Malleability in Bitcoin[C]// Springer. 15th International Workshop on Information Security Applications. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014: 27-37.
[85]	PÉREZ-SOLÀ C, DELGADO-SEGURA S, NAVARRO-ARRIBAS G, et al. Double-Spending Prevention for Bitcoin Zero-Confirmation Transactions[J]. International Journal of Information Security, 2019, 18(4): 451-463. doi: 10.1007/s10207-018-0422-4
[86]	GOLDSMTH D, GRAUER K, SHMALO Y. Analyzing Hack Subnetworks in the Bitcoin Transaction Graph[J]. Applied Network Science, 2020, 5: 22-35. doi: 10.1007/s41109-020-00261-7
[87]	SILVEIRA A, BETARTE G, CRISTIA M, et al. A Formal Analysis of the Mimblewimble Cryptocurrency Protocol[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(17): 5951-5963. doi: 10.3390/s21175951 URL
[88]	YANG Xiao, LAU W, YE Qingqing, et al. Practical Escrow Protocol for Bitcoin[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2020, 15: 3023-3034. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.10206 URL
[89]	NAUMENKO G, MAXWELL G, WUILLE P, et al. Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for Bitcoin[C]// ACM. ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2019: 817-831.
[90]	FENG Qi, HE Debiao, LUO Min, et al. Practical Secure Two-Party EdDSA Signature Generation with Key Protection and Applications in Cryptocurrency[C]// IEEE.19th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. New York: IEEE, 2020-2021: 137-147.
[91]	FENG Xiaoqin, MA Jianfeng, WANG Huaxiong, et al. An Accessional Signature Scheme With Unmalleable Transaction Implementation to Securely Redeem Cryptocurrencies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2023, 18: 4144-4156. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3293402 URL
[92]	LIN Yujing, WU Powei, HSU Chenghan, et al. An Evaluation of Bitcoin Address Classification Based on Transaction History Summarization[C]// IEEE. 1st IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency. New York: IEEE, 2019: 302-310.
[93]	IBRAHIM R F, MOHAMMAD E A, ABABNEH M. Illicit Account Detection in the Ethereum Blockchain Using Machine Learning[C]// IEEE. 2021 International Conference on Information Technology. New York: IEEE, 2021: 488-493.
[94]	KUMAR N, SINGH A, HANDA A, et al. Detecting Malicious Accounts on the Ethereum Blockchain with Supervised Learning[C]// Springer. 4th International Symposium on Cyber Security Cryptography and Machine Learning. Heidelberg: Springer, 2020: 94-109.
[95]	NERURKAR P. Illegal Activity Detection on Bitcoin Transaction Using Deep Learning[J]. Soft Computing, 2023, 27(9): 5503-5520. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07779-1
[96]	SHEN Meng, SANG Anqi, ZHU Liehuang, et al. Abnormal Transaction Behavior Recognition Based on Motivation Analysis in Blockchain Digital Currency[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2021, 44(1): 193-208.
	沈蒙, 桑安琪, 祝烈煌, 等. 基于动机分析的区块链数字货币异常交易行为识别方法[J]. 计算机学报, 2021, 44(1): 193-208.
[97]	WAHRSTATTER A, GOMES J J, KHAN S, et al. Improving Cryptocurrency Crime Detection: Coinjoin Community Detection Approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023, 20(6): 4946-4956. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2023.3238412 URL
[98]	SUN Hanyi, RUAN Na, LIU Hanqing. Ethereum Analysis via Node Clustering[C]// Springer. 13th International Conference on Network and System Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019: 114-129.
[99]	LIN Dan, WU Jiajing, QI Xuan, et al. Xuan Ethereum Transaction Tracking: Inferring Evolution of Transaction Networks via Link Prediction[J]. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 600: 127504-127516. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127504 URL
[100]	BHARGAVI M S, KATTI S M, SHILPA M, et al. Transactional Data Analytics for Inferring Behavioural Traits in Ethereum Blockchain Network[C]// IEEE. IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing. New York: IEEE, 2020: 485-490.
[101]	KAMYAR S L, JAFARZADEH G S, ELHAMBAKHSH F, et al. Monitoring Blockchain Cryptocurrency Transactions to Improve the Trustworthiness of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0)[J]. Algorithms, 2020, 13(12): 312-323. doi: 10.3390/a13120312 URL
[102]	LI Shengnan, YANG Zhao, TESSONE C J. Proof-of-Work Cryptocurrency Mining: A Statistical Approach to Fairness[C]// IEEE. CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC). New York: IEEE, 2020: 156-161.
[103]	FAN Wenjun, HONG H J, KIM J, et al. Lightweight and Identifier-Oblivious Engine for Cryptocurrency Networking Anomaly Detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023, 20(2): 1302-1318. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2022.3152937 URL
[104]	WU Jiajing, LIU Jieli, CHEN Weili, et al. Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network with Hybrid Motifs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems, 2022, 52(4): 2237-2249. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3049278 URL
[105]	KAZI A T, TAHMIN N, SYED A H. Enhanced Cryptocurrency Security by Time-Based Token Multi-Factor Authentication Algorithm[C]// IEEE. 1st International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques. New York: IEEE, 2019: 308-312.
[106]	YU Yong, DING Yujie, ZHAO Yanqi, et al. LRCoin: Leakage-Resilient Cryptocurrency Based on Bitcoin for Data Trading in IoT[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6(3): 4702-4710. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2878406
[107]	CHEN Ting, ZHANG Yufei, LI Zihao, et al. TokenScope: Automatically Detecting Inconsistent Behaviors of Cryptocurrency Tokens in Ethereum[C]// ACM. ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2019: 1503-1520.
[108]	LIU Bin, GAO Zhifeng, XIAO Di, et al. Quantum Identity Authentication in the Counterfactual Quantum Key Distribution Protocol[J]. Entropy, 2019, 21(5): 518-533. doi: 10.3390/e21050518 URL
[109]	ZHOU L, WANG Shengtao, CHOI S, et al. Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices[J]. Physical Review X, 2020, 10(2): 21067-21082. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021067 URL

方案	安全漏洞/ 攻击	保密性	完整性	可用性	防御措施	年份
文献[6]	密码漏洞、恢复钱包漏洞	√	—	—	安全地备份加密钱包并定期更换密钥	2019
文献[7]	穷举搜索的暴力破解攻击	√	√	—	修改比特币协议、构建特殊的智能合约对哈希函数漏洞进行报警	2019
文献[8]	移动钱包的源代码漏洞	√	—	—	关注网络层面的隐私	2019
文献[4]	存储过程中的密钥可以明文访问或解密的漏洞	√	—	—	—	2020
	存储过程中的第三方可修改漏洞	—	√	√	—
	监视导入过程中的复制粘贴的漏洞	√	—	—	—
	监听密码验证过程中的密码输入	√	—	—	—
	篡改钱包显示的交易信息	—	√	—	—
	切断钱包与区块链网络或钱包服务器的连接	—	—	√	—
文献[5]	USB调试漏洞	√	—	—	对复制和粘贴敏感数据等危险操作进行警告，加密钱包应该使用二维码、NFC等方式进行输入	2020
	截图功能中的漏洞	√	—	—
	识别并替换敏感信息	√	√	—
	可访问性服务漏洞	√	—	—
文献[9]	确定性钱包、隐身地址算法中的漏洞	√	—	—	具有公开派生公钥的密钥绝缘和隐私保护签名方案	2022

方案	漏洞类型	检测技术	FPR	FNR	准确率	召回率	精确率	F1值	AUC	年份
文献[22]	未检查的低级别调用	SmartCheck	—	—	0.976	1.00	0.788	0.881	0.987	2021
	时间戳依赖	Slither	—	—	0.968	1.00	0.208	0.345	0.984
	溢出漏洞	VeriSmart	—	—	0.908	1.00	0.50	0.667	0.949
	时间戳依赖	Solhint	—	—	0.938	1.00	0.119	0.213	0.969
文献[23]	拒绝服务	DT	—	—	0.9118	0.985	0.506	0.669	0.945	2021
文献[22]	可重入	Oyente	—	—	0.987	0.935	0.829	0.879	0.962	2021
文献[23]	拒绝服务	RF	—	—	0.9595	0.814	0.757	0.785	0.894	2021
文献[22]	领先漏洞	Oyente	—	—	0.948	0.50	0.065	0.114	0.725	2021
	时间戳依赖漏洞	Manticore	—	—	0.993	0.40	0.667	0.50	0.699
	时间戳依赖漏洞	Securify	—	—	0.993	0.20	1.00	0.333	0.6
	拒绝服务	Mythril	—	—	0.987	0.167	0.25	0.20	0.581
	访问控制	Mythril	—	—	0.97	0.167	0.50	0.25	0.576
文献[20]	文献中的21种安全漏洞	NeuCheck	0.157	0.165	—	—	—	—	—	2021
		Securify	0.167	0.728	—	—	—	—	—
		Mythril	0.6000	0.8348	—	—	—	—	—
文献[24]	可重入	RA	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	2020

方案	漏洞类型	检测技术	漏洞数量/个	年份
文献[20]	未指定可见级的漏洞	NeuCheck	450882	2021
	依赖于可预测的变量漏洞		79842
	访问控制漏洞		70522
	散列冲突漏洞		43497
	可重入漏洞		38086
	整数上溢和下溢漏洞		17663
文献[25]	函数调用漏洞	EVM+Solidity扩展	73（61个成功、12个失败）	2021
文献[26]	受保护溢出但不会被触发	EASYFLOW	42580	2019
	安全		19914
	受保护溢出但会被触发		3871
	明显溢出漏洞		465
	受保护溢出		6

方案	蜜罐陷阱	检测技术	PR-AUC	召回率	年份
文献[31]	检测是否为蜜罐	XGBoost	0.900	—	2021
文献[30]	类型扣除溢出	XGBoost	—	1.000	2020
	未初始化的结构体		—	0.949
	隐藏转移		—	0.923
	隐藏状态更新		—	0.911
	遗传性疾病		—	0.907
	稻草人合同		—	0.903
	跳过空字符串字面量		—	0.900
	平衡失调		—	0.850

方案	技术	分类	Acc	精确率	召回率	F1值	年份
文献[37]	GB	交易所	—	1.00	1.00	1.00	2019
		混合器		1.00	1.00	1.00
		市场		1.00	1.00	1.00
		矿池		1.00	1.00	1.00
		赌博		0.99	1.00	0.99
		服务		1.00	0.93	0.96
	RF	混合器	—	1.00	1.00	1.00
		赌博		1.00	1.00	1.00
		交易所		0.96	1.00	0.98
		服务		1.00	0.93	0.96
		矿池		1.00	0.92	0.96
		市场		1.00	0.85	0.91
文献[36]	GBC	预测没有分类实体	0.8042	-	0.8083	0.7964	2019