Research on Data Security Threats and Protection of Key Technologies in Cloud Environment

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2022.07.007

Abstract

Abstract:

With the rapid development of cloud computing technology, the cloud has gradually become the main way to store data. Cloud storage owns massive storage space, which provides storage, management and other services and enables the users to access the cloud data at any time without limitations by location or device factors. However, after outsourcing data to the cloud, users usually lose their physical control over data, and data security has become the key factor to restrict the development of the cloud computing market. This paper started with the security threats faced by data in the cloud environment, followed by data security requirements. Then, this paper summarized and described the key technologies of the protection technologies for cloud data. Finally, current challenges and future research trends in the field of cloud data security were introduced, so as to promote the cloud data protection system.

Key words: cloud computing, data security threats, data security protection

CLC Number:

TP309

YU Chengli, ZHANG Yang, JIA Shijie. Research on Data Security Threats and Protection of Key Technologies in Cloud Environment[J]. Netinfo Security, 2022, 22(7): 55-63.

Figures/Tables 4

References 39

[1]	MELL P, GRANCE T, et al. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Special Publication (NIST SP)[M]. Gaithersburg: NIST, 2011.
[2]	LI Bohu, LI Bing. Introduction to Cloud Computing[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2018.
	李伯虎, 李兵. 云计算导论[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018.
[3]	DIJK M V, JUELS A, OPREA A, et al. Hourglass Schemes: How to Prove that Cloud Files are Encrypted[C]// ACM. the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2012: 265-280.
[4]	HU Keji, ZHANG Wensheng. Efficient Verification of Data Encryption on Cloud Servers[C]// IEEE. 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. New York: IEEE, 2014: 314-321.
[5]	FANG Jinxia, LIU Limin, LIN Jingqiang. Practical Verification of Data Encryption for Cloud Storage Services[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2019.
[6]	YOU Weijing, LIU Limin, MA Yue, et al. An Intel SGX-Based Proof of Encryption in Clouds[J]. Netinfo Security, 2020, 20(12): 1-8.
	尤玮婧, 刘丽敏, 马悦, 等. 基于安全硬件的云端数据机密性验证方案[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(12): 1-8.
[7]	ATENIESE G, BURNS R, CURTMOLA R, et al. Provable Data Possession at Untrusted Stores[C]// ACM. Proceedings of ACM CCS 2007. New York: ACM, 2007: 598-609.
[8]	JUELS A and KALISKI B S. PORs: Proofs of Retrievability for Large Files[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. New York: ACM, 2007: 584-597.
[9]	SHACHAM H and WATER B. Compact Proofs of Retrievability[C]// Spring. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008: 90-107.
[10]	ATENIESE G, PIETRO, MANCINI L, et al. Scalable and Efficient Provable Data Possession[C]// ACM. 4th International ICST Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. New York: ACM, 2008: 1-10.
[11]	ERWAY C, KÜPÇÜ A, PAPAMANTHOU C, et al. Dynamic Provable Data Possession[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM, 2009: 213-222.
[12]	WANG Qian, WANG Cong, REN Kui, et al. Enabling Public Auditability and Data Dynamics for Storage Security in Cloud Computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2011, 22(5): 847-859. doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2010.183 URL
[13]	ZHU Yan, WANG Huai, HU Zexing, et al. Dynamic Audit Services for Outsourced Storage in Clouds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2013, 6(2), 227-238. doi: 10.1109/TSC.2011.51 URL
[14]	TIAN Hui, CHEN Yuxiang, CHANG ChinChen, et al. Dynamic-Hash-Table Based Public Auditing for Secure Cloud Storage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2017, 10(5): 701-714. doi: 10.1109/TSC.2015.2512589 URL
[15]	WANG Cong, WANG Qian, REN Kui, et al. Ensuring Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing[C]// IEEE. Proceedings of 17th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQOS). New York:IEEE, 2009: 1-9.
[16]	CHEN Bo, CURTMOLA R. Robust Dynamic Remote Data Checking for Public Clouds[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2012). New York: ACM, 2012: 1043-1045.
[17]	CASH D, KÜPCÜ A, WICHS D. Dynamic Proofs of Retrievability via Oblivious RAM[C]// Springer. Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 279-295.
[18]	ANTHOINE G, DUMAS J, JONGHE M, et al. Dynamic Proofs of Retrievability with Low Server Storage[C]// USENIX. 30th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security 2021. Berkeley: USENIX, 2021: 537-554.
[19]	WANG Boyang, LI Baochun, LI Hui. Oruta: Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Shared Data in the Cloud[C]// IEEE. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. New York: IEEE, 2012: 295-302.
[20]	WANG Boyang, LI Baochun, LI Hui. Knox: Privacy-Preserving Auditing for Shared Data with Large Groups in the Cloud[J]. Applied Cryptography and Network Security, 2012, 7341: 507-525.
[21]	ATENIESE G, BURNS R C, CURTMOLA R, et al. Provable Data Possession at Untrusted Stores[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security(CCS 2007). New York: ACM, 2007: 598-609.
[22]	CURTMOLA R, KHAN O, BURNS R C, et al. MR-PDP: Multiple-Replica Provable Data Possession[C]// IEEE. 28th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2008). New York: IEEE, 2008: 411-420.
[23]	LI Limin, YANG Yahui, WU Zhonghai. FMR-PDP: Flexible Multiple-Replica Provable Data Possession in Cloud Storage[C]// IEEE. 2017 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC 2017). New York: IEEE, 2017: 1115-1121.
[24]	YI Mingxu, WEI Jinxia, SONG Lingwei. Efficient Integrity Verification of Replicated Data in Cloud Computing System[J]. Computers and Security, 2017, 65(3): 202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2016.11.003 URL
[25]	ARMKNECHT F, BARMAN L, BOHLI J, et al. Mirror: Enabling Proofs of Data Replication and Retrievability in the Cloud[C]// USENIX. 25th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security 16. Berkeley: USENIX, 2016: 1051-1068.
[26]	BOWERS K D, VAN DIJK M, JUELS A, et al. How to Tell if Your Cloud Files are Vulnerable to Drive Crashes[C]// ACM. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2011). New York: ACM, 2011: 501-514.
[27]	WANG Z, SUN K, JAJODIA S, et al. Disk Storage Isolation and Verification in Cloud[C]// IEEE. 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2012). New York: IEEE, 2012: 771-776.
[28]	YOU Weijing. Research on Data Security Attribute Verification in Cloud Storage Environment[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021.
	尤玮婧. 云存储环境下的数据安全属性验证研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2021.
[29]	Protocol Labs. Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network[EB/OL]. (2017-07-12)[2022-03-11]. https://filecoin.io/filecoin.pdf.
[30]	Protocol Labs. Proof of Replication[EB/OL]. (2017-07-27)[2022-03-11]. https://filecoin.io/proof-of-replication.pdf.
[31]	DAMGARD I, GANESH C, ORLANDI C. Proofs of Replicated Storage without Timing Assumptions[C]// Springer. Advances in Cryptology- CRYPTO 2019:39th Annual International Cryptology Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2019: 355-380.
[32]	PERLMAN R. File System Design with Assured Delete[C]// IEEE. 3rd International IEEE Security in Storage Workshop (SISW’05). New York: IEEE, 2005: 76-88.
[33]	GEAMBASU R, KOHNO T, LEVY A A. et al. Vanish: Increasing Data Privacy with Self-Destructing Data[C]// USENIX. In USENIX Security Symposium. Berkeley: USENIX, 2009: 299-315.
[34]	XIONG Jinbo, LIU Ximeng, YAO Zhiqiang, et al. A Secure Data Self-Destructing Scheme in Cloud Computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2014, 2(4): 448-458.
[35]	TANG Yang, LEE P P, LUI J C, et al. Secure Overlay Cloud Storage with Access Control and Assured Deletion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2012, 9(6): 903-916. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2012.49 URL
[36]	YU Yong, XUE Liang, LI Yannan, et al. Assured Data Deletion with Fine-Grained Access Control for Fog-Based Industrial Applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 14 (10): 4538-4547. doi: 10.1109/TII.2018.2841047 URL
[37]	XUE Liang, YU Yong, LI Yannan, et al. Efficient Attribute-Based Encryption with Attribute Revocation for Assured Data Deletion[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 479: 640-650. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.015
[38]	GREEN M D, MIERS I. Forward Secure Asynchronous Messaging from Puncturable Encryption[C]// IEEE. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. New York: IEEE, 2015: 305-320.
[39]	TIAN Junfeng, WANG Ziwei. Cloud Data Assured Deletion Scheme Based on Dynamic Sliding Window[J]. Peer to Peer Networking and Applications, 2022, 15: 1817-1833. doi: 10.1007/s12083-022-01318-3 URL

安全需求	功能	防护技术
数据机密性	确保数据无法被未经授权的实体所理解	机密性验证
数据完整性	确保存储数据完整	完整性验证
数据可用性	确保数据冗余存储	可用性验证
数据可信删除	确保数据被诚实地删除	可信删除技术

属性		基于RSA 编码^[3]	基于排列编码^[3]	基于蝶形编码^[3]	HU^[4]	FANG^[5]	尤玮婧^[6]
用户端计算开销	加密	O(tm)	O(tm)	O(tm)	O(nm)	O(tm)	—
	数据封装	O(nm) RSA	O(nm) memory access	O(nmlogm) AES	O(n)C+ O(nm) memory access	O(n)C+ O(tm) memory access	—
	生成标签	O(n)hash	O(n)hash	O(n)hash	O(nm)AES	O(n)hash+ O(n)AES	—
云端计算开销	加密	O(nm)	O(nm)	O(nm)	—	O(nm)	O(nm)
	数据封装	—	O(nm) memory access	O(nmlogm) AES	—	O(n)C+ O(nm) memory access	—
	生成标签	—	—	—	—	O(n)hash	O(n)hash+ O(nm) memory access
远程证明计算开销		—	—	—	—	—	C_r
磁盘介质		—	转动硬盘驱动器	—	—	—	—
硬件要求		—	—	—	—	—	Intel SGX