一种基于PUF的物理层安全认证方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2020.01.009

信息网络安全 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 61-66.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2020.01.009

一种基于PUF的物理层安全认证方法

胡蝶^1,², 马东堂¹(), 龚旻², 马召²

1. 国防科技大学电子科学学院,长沙 410073
2. 中国运载火箭技术研究院,北京 100076

收稿日期:2019-05-30 出版日期:2020-01-10 发布日期:2020-05-11
作者简介:
作者简介：胡蝶（1996—）,女,湖北,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为飞行器总体设计及通信系统;马东堂（1969—）,男,安徽,教授,博士,主要研究方向为宽带通信与网络、物理层安全、认知无线电与认知网络;龚旻（1982—）,男,湖南,研究员,博士,主要研究方向为飞行器总体设计及通信系统;马召（1989—）,男,河南,工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为通信与数据链系统设计。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金[61601480, 61372099]

A Physical Layer Security Authentication Method Based on PUF

HU Die^1,², MA Dongtang¹(), GONG Ming², MA Zhao²

1. School of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2. China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Beijing 100076, China

Received:2019-05-30 Online:2020-01-10 Published:2020-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

传统无线通信的认证主要依赖于上层加密机制,无法保证系统处理的实时性与物理层的安全性。文章设计了一种基于物理不可克隆函数（Physical Unclonable Function,PUF）进行物理层安全认证的方案,利用硬件固有的激励-响应对（Challenge-Response Pair,CRP）的唯一性与发送信息的随机性实时生成验证标签,在接收端通过比较接收与生成的标签来识别接收信号与其发射端,为物理层的信息安全提供有效保护。该方法不需要复杂的密码算法,减小了通信过程中的计算量。仿真结果表明,该方法有较高的实用价值。

关键词: 物理不可克隆函数, 物理层安全, 认证, 小波变换, 哈希函数

Abstract:

The authentication method of traditional wireless communication mainly depends on the upper layer encryption mechanism, which cannot guarantee the real-time processing of the system and the security of the physical layer. This paper presents a physical layer security authentication method based on physical unclonable function(PUF), generating authentication labels in real time by using the uniqueness of challenge-response pairs (CRP), which is the intrinsic hardware feature, and the randomness of information. In the receiving end, the received signal and the transmitter are identified by comparing the received and generated tags, which provides effective protection for the information security of the physical layer. This method does not need complex cryptographic algorithm and reduces the calculation in the communication process. Simulation results show that this method has high use value.

Key words: PUF, physical layer security, authentication, wavelet transform, hash function

中图分类号:

TP309

胡蝶, 马东堂, 龚旻, 马召. 一种基于PUF的物理层安全认证方法[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(1): 61-66.

HU Die, MA Dongtang, GONG Ming, MA Zhao. A Physical Layer Security Authentication Method Based on PUF[J]. Netinfo Security, 2020, 20(1): 61-66.

图/表 6

参考文献 20

[1]	LAI Lifeng, GAMAL E, POOR H V.Authentication Over Noisy Channels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2009, 55(2): 906-916.
[2]	WANG Xianbin, HAO Peng, LAJOS H.Physical-layer Authentication for Wireless Security Enhancement: Current Challenges and Future Developments[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2016, 54(6): 152-158.
[3]	TUGNAIT J K.Wireless User Authentication via Comparison of Power Spectral Densities[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, 31(9): 1791-1802.
[4]	CHOI J.A Coding Approach with Key-channel Randomization for Physical-layer Authentication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2019, 14(1): 175-185.
[5]	YU P L, BARAS J S, SADLER B M.Physical-layer Authentication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2008, 3(1): 38-51.
[6]	WANG Wenhao, SUN Zhi, PIAO Sixu, et al.Wireless Physical-layer Identification: Modeling and Validation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics & Security, 2015, 11(9): 2091-2106.
[7]	BIHL T J, BAUER K W, TEMPLE M A.Feature Selection for RF Fingerprinting with Multiple Discriminant Analysis and Using ZigBee Device Emissions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2016, 11(8): 1862-1874.
[8]	REISING D R, TEMPLE M A, JACKSON J A.Authorized and Rogue Device Discrimination Using Dimensionally Reduced RF-DNA Fingerprints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics & Security, 2015, 10(6): 1180-1192.
[9]	JORSWIECK E, TOMASIN S, SEZGIN A.Broadcasting into the Uncertainty: Authentication and Confidentiality by Physical-Layer Processing[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2015, 103(10): 1702-1724.
[10]	ZHANG Shengjun, JIN Liang, LOU Yangming, et al.Secret Key Generation Based on Two-Way Randomness for TDD-SISO System[J]. China Communications, 2018, 15(7): 202-216.
[11]	ALTHUNIBAT S, SUCASAS V, MANTAS G, et al.Physical-layer Entity Authentication Scheme for Mobile MIMO Systems[J]. IET Communications, 2018, 12(6): 712-718.
[12]	SHAN Dan, ZENG Kai, XIANG Weidong, et al.PHY-CRAM: Physical Layer Challenge-response Authentication Mechanism for Wireless Networks[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, 31(9): 1817-1827.
[13]	WU Xiaofu, YANG Zhen.Physical-layer Authentication for Multi-carrier Transmission[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2015, 19(1): 74-77.
[14]	PENG Hao, WANG Xianbin, BEHNAD A.Relay Authentication by Exploiting I/Q Imbalance in Amplify-and-forward System[C]//IEEE. Global Communications Conference, December 8-12, 2014, Austin, Texas, USA. New Jersey: IEEE, 2015: 613-618.
[15]	ZHENG Yue, SOMNATH D S, CHANG C H.Securing IoT Monitoring Device using PUF and Physical Layer Authentication[C]//IEEE. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 27-30, 2018, Florence, Italy. New Jersey: IEEE, 2018: 1-5.
[16]	CHEN An.Utilizing the Variability of Resistive Random Access Memory to Implement Reconfigurable Physical Unclonable Functions[J]. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2015, 36(2): 138-140.
[17]	XIONG Jun, MA Dongtang, WONG K K, et al.Robust Masked Beam Forming for MISO Cognitive Radio Networks with Unknown Eavesdroppers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016, 65(2): 744-755.
[18]	ZHANG Jiliang, QU Gang, LV Yongqiang, et al.A Survey on Silicon PUFs and Recent Advances in Ring Oscillator PUFs[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2014, 29(4): 664-678.
[19]	HOLCOMB D E, BURLESON W P, FU K.Power-Up SRAM State as an Identifying Fingerprint and Source of True Random Numbers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2008, 58(9): 1198-1210.
[20]	GUAJARDO J, KUMAR S S, SCHRIJEN G J, et al.FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection[M]//Springer. Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems-CHES 2007. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 63-80.

一种基于PUF的物理层安全认证方法

A Physical Layer Security Authentication Method Based on PUF

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	余果, 王冲华, 陈雪鸿, 李俊. 认证视角下的工业互联网标识解析安全[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(9): 77-81.
[2]	丁举鹏, 易芝玲, 王劲涛, 阳辉. 可见光通信物理链路的基准保密容量比较研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(5): 65-71.
[3]	刘晓芬, 陈晓峰, 连桂仁, 林崧. 基于d级单粒子的可认证多方量子秘密共享协议[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(3): 51-55.
[4]	侯林, 冯达, 玄鹏开, 周福才. 基于认证树的外包数据库连接查询验证方案[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(2): 91-97.
[5]	张富友, 王琼霄, 宋利. 基于生物特征识别的统一身份认证系统研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(9): 86-90.
[6]	侯林, 李明洁, 徐剑, 周福才. 基于变长认证跳表的分布式动态数据持有证明模型[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(7): 67-74.
[7]	亢保元, 颉明明, 司林. 基于生物识别技术的多云服务器认证方案研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(6): 45-52.
[8]	陈瑞滢, 陈泽茂, 王浩. 工业控制系统安全监控协议的设计与优化研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(2): 60-69.
[9]	韦永霜, 陈建华, 韦永美. 基于椭圆曲线密码的RFID/NFC安全认证协议[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(12): 64-71.
[10]	张顺, 陈张凯, 梁风雨, 石润华. 基于Bell态的量子双向身份认证协议[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(11): 43-48.
[11]	张敏, 许春香, 黄闽英. 远程医疗环境下面向多服务器的轻量级多因子身份认证协议研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(10): 42-49.
[12]	姚萌萌, 朱正超, 刘明达. 一种改进的基于认证测试的形式化分析方法[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(1): 27-33.
[13]	郝文江, 宋斐, 万月亮. 可穿戴单警装备安全认证协议研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 18(9): 25-29.
[14]	段琼琼, 项定华, 史红周. 基于区块链的智能物件认证技术方案设计[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 18(9): 95-101.
[15]	胡卫, 吴邱涵, 刘胜利, 付伟. 基于国密算法和区块链的移动端安全eID及认证协议设计[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 18(7): 7-9.