我国跨境数据流动治理的研究综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2022.10.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

数据跨境流动的常态化发展对我国数据安全造成了一定冲击和挑战，相关研究为探索我国跨境数据流动的治理提供了重要的参考。文章运用系统性文献综述的方法，从利益关切、治理模式、治理路径3个角度阐述我国数据跨境流动治理的研究现状。通过分析发现，当前我国跨境数据流动治理的研究尚处于起步阶段，需要建立利益关切的平衡机制，探索多元化的合作治理模式并构建双轨制治理路径。未来应确立以国家安全为底线的治理基准，着力创新跨境数据合规的体系建设，探索数据规制措施的必要性评估制度。

关键词: 跨境数据流动, 数据安全, 数据治理, 国际合作, 本土化方案

Abstract:

The normalized development of cross-border data flows has brought impact and challenge to our country’s data security, the relevant research could provide a reference for enriching academic theory for exploring governance schemes for cross-border data flows in China. By using the method of systematic literature review, this paper expounded the research status of China’s cross-border data flow governance from the perspectives of interest concern, governance model and governance path. Through analyzing, the study found that the research on governance of cross-border data flow in China was still in primary stage, and it was necessary to establish a mechanism for balancing interests, explore a diversified cooperative governance model, and build a dual track governance path. In the future, the data governance criterion should be established with the overall view of national security, focus on the innovation of cross-border data compliance system construction, and explore the necessity evaluation system of data regulation measures.

Key words: cross-border data flow, data security, data governance, international cooperation, localization scheme

中图分类号:

TP309

肖晓雷, 赵雪莲. 我国跨境数据流动治理的研究综述[J]. 信息网络安全, 2022, 22(10): 45-51.

XIAO Xiaolei, ZHAO Xuelian. Overview of the Research on Governance of Cross-Border Data Flow in China[J]. Netinfo Security, 2022, 22(10): 45-51.

图/表 2

参考文献 28

[1]	WU Xuan. Construction of Cross-Border Rules for Personal Information in the Perspective of Data Sovereignty[J]. Tsinghua University Law Journal, 2021, 15(3): 74-91.
	吴玄. 数据主权视野下个人信息跨境规则的构建[J]. 清华法学, 2021, 15(3):74-91.
[2]	WANG Meili, CHEN Yu. Data Sovereignty in China: Legal Meaning and System Construction[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2022, 41(6): 1-8.
	王玫黎, 陈雨. 中国数据主权的法律意涵与体系构建[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1-8.
[3]	SHI Jingxia. The WTO Plurilateral Negotiation on E-Commerce under the Context of Digital Economy: Recent Development and Focusing on the Controversial Issues[J]. Oriental Law, 2020(2): 170-178.
	石静霞. 数字经济背景下的WTO电子商务诸边谈判:最新发展及焦点问题[J]. 东方法学, 2020(2): 170-178.
[4]	YANG Shudong, XIE Zhuojun. Exceptions to the Regulation of Cross Border Data Flow Trade: Orientation, Paradigm and Reflection[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2021(8): 1-15.
	杨署东, 谢卓君. 跨境数据流动贸易规制之例外条款:定位、范式与反思[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(8):1-15.
[5]	ZHANG Kunbei, CHEN Xingyue. Rectifying and Restoring the Systematic Balance of Data Transfer Regulation[J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2022(3): 87-96.
	张琨蓓, 陈星月. 跨境数据流动法律规制协调性之检视与重塑[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2022(3):87-96.
[6]	MAO Weizhun, LIU Yishen. Data Nationalism: Rationale and Policy Influence[J]. Global Review, 2020, 12(3): 20-42.
	毛维准, 刘一燊. 数据民族主义:驱动逻辑与政策影响[J]. 国际展望, 2020, 12(3):20-42.
[7]	MEI Ao, HOU Zhishuai. The Dilemma of Cross Border Data Compliance of Internet Enterprises and China’s Countermeasures[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2021(6): 56-62.
	梅傲, 侯之帅. 互联网企业跨境数据合规的困境及中国应对[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(6):56-62.
[8]	FENG Shuo. The Game of Data and the Response from the Perspective of Law Behind the Ban of Tik Tok[J]. Oriental Law, 2021(1): 74-89.
	冯硕. Tik Tok被禁中的数据博弈与法律回应[J]. 东方法学, 2021(1): 74-89.
[9]	CHEN Bing, XU Wen. Establishing a Governance System of the Flow of Data Across Borders[J]. Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2021(4): 67-75.
	陈兵, 徐文. 数据跨境流动的治理体系建构[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2021(4):67-75.
[10]	QI Xiangquan, WEN Yuanyi. Establishing Regional Legal System Regulating the Trans-Border Personal Data Flow among B&R Countries: Divergence, Consensus and Cooperative Approach[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University, 2019(6): 71-80.
	齐湘泉, 文媛怡. 构建一带一路个人数据跨境传输法律制度:分歧、共识与合作路径[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(6): 71-80.
[11]	ZHAO Jun, XIANG Li. Study on Privacy Protection in the Cross-Border Flow of Personal Information from the Perspective of Cross-Border E-Commerce Development[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities And Social Sciences), 2019, 49(2): 58-71.
	赵骏, 向丽. 跨境电子商务建设视角下个人信息跨境流动的隐私权保护研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 49(2): 58-71.
[12]	PENG Yue. Conflict and Solution of Data Privacy Protection from the Perspective of Trade Regulation[J]. Journal of Comparative Law, 2018(4): 176-187.
	彭岳. 贸易规制视域下数据隐私保护的冲突与解决[J]. 比较法研究, 2018(4): 176-187.
[13]	HONG Yanqing. Promoting “The Belt and Road” Data Cross-Border Flow in China: Unfolding with the Background of the US-Europe Paradigm[J]. China Law Review, 2021(2): 30-42.
	洪延青. 推进“一带一路“数据跨境流动的中国方案——以美欧范式为背景的展开[J]. 中国法律评论, 2021(2):30-42.
[14]	HUANG Haiying, HE Mengting. Interpretation of US Data Sovereignty Strategy Based on CLOUD Act[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2019, 9(2): 34-44.
	黄海瑛, 何梦婷. 基于CLOUD法案的美国数据主权战略解读[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(2): 34-44.
[15]	WANG Meili, CHEN Yu. Research on the Docking between China’s Cross-Border Data Transfer Rules and the CPTPP[J]. Intertrade, 2022(4): 20-29.
	王玫黎, 陈雨. 中国数据跨境流动规则与CPTPP的对接研究[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(4): 20-29.
[16]	XIE Yongjiang, ZHU Lin, SHANG Jie. EU-U. S. Privacy Shield and Its Enlightenment to China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2016(6): 39-44.
	谢永江, 朱琳, 尚洁. 欧美隐私盾协议及其对我国的启示[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(6): 39-44.
[17]	ZHAO Haile. A Study on the Divergence of US and EU’s Data Governance in the Tik Tok Dispute[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40(5): 104-110.
	赵海乐. Tik Tok争议中的美欧数据治理路径差异研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(5): 104-110.
[18]	YANG Xi. Intergenerational Development and Experience of EU’s Personal Data Protection System—A Model of Internal Regulation and External Expansion[J]. International Business: Journal of the University of International Business and Economics, 2019(5): 145-156.
	杨希. 欧盟个人数据保护体系的代际发展及借鉴——内部规制与外部扩展的典范[J]. 国际商务:对外经济贸易大学学报, 2019(5): 145-156.
[19]	JIN Jing. EU Standard for International Transfers of Personal Data: Construction of Rules, Promotion of Justice and Expansion of Paradigm[J]. Chinese Journal of European Studies, 2021, 39(4): 90-109.
	金晶. 个人数据跨境传输的欧盟标准——规则构建、司法推动与范式扩张[J]. 欧洲研究, 2021, 39(4): 90-109.
[20]	YANG Fan. Post-Schrems Ⅱ Case Evolution of Legal Regulation of Cross-Border Data Flow in EU and China’s Response[J]. Global Law Review, 2022, 44(1): 178-192.
	杨帆. 后“SchremsII案”时期欧盟数据跨境流动法律监管的演进及我国的因应[J]. 环球法律评论, 2022, 44(1): 178-192.
[21]	FAN Ying. The Differentiation of Data Localisation Connotations and Model Choices[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2022, 41(6): 86-91.
	范婴. 数据本地化的内涵分化与模式选择[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(6):86-91.
[22]	BU Xuemin. On the Reconsideration and System Construction of Data Localization Mode[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(12): 80-87.
	卜学民. 论数据本地化模式的反思与制度构建[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12):80-87.
[23]	HU Wenhua, KONG Huafeng. Indian Data Localization and Cross-Border Flow Legislation Practice[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2019, 36(8): 306-310.
	胡文华, 孔华锋. 印度数据本地化与跨境流动立法实践研究[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2019, 36(8):306-310.
[24]	LIU Jinhe, CUI Baoguo. Data Localization and Data Defensivism: Rationale and Trends[J]. Global Review, 2020, 12(6): 89-107.
	刘金河, 崔保国. 数据本地化和数据防御主义的合理性与趋势[J]. 国际展望, 2020, 12(6):89-107.
[25]	XIONG Hongru, TIAN Jietang. De-Encirclement: The “China Scheme” for the Rules of Cross-Border Flow of Data[J]. Frontiers, 2021(9): 54-62.
	熊鸿儒, 田杰棠. 突出重围:数据跨境流动规则的“中国方案”[J]. 学术前沿, 2021(9):54-62.
[26]	MA Zhongfa, HU Ling. The Improvement of China’s Legal System of Data Security Protection[J]. Science Technology and Law, 2021(2): 1-7.
	马忠法, 胡玲. 论我国数据安全保护法律制度的完善[J]. 科技与法律, 2021(2):1-7.
[27]	XUE Yisa. The Construction of the Multi-tier Outbound Data Systemand the Realization of FreeData Flowing——Starting with the Reform of the Substantive Review System[J]. Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities, 2020(6): 64-74.
	薛亦飒. 多层次数据出境体系构建与数据流动自由的实现——以实质性审查制变革为起点[J]. 西北民族大学学报, 2020(6): 64-74.
[28]	LI Yanhua. Supervision on the Cross-Border Flows of European and American Data in the Post-Schrems Ⅱ Era and China’s Response—The Trend of Soft Data Localization Mechanism and the Innovation of the Standard Contractual Clauses Path[J]. Chinese Journal of European Studies, 2021, 39(6): 25-49.
	李艳华. 隐私盾案后欧美数据的跨境流动监管及中国对策——软数据本地化机制的走向与标准合同条款路径的革新[J]. 欧洲研究, 2021, 39(6):25-49.