Research on Security Evaluation Index System for Video Monitoring Network

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2021.12.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Video monitoring network plays an important role in maintaining national security. At present, there are more attacks against video network. By studying the security evaluation index system and evaluation model for video monitoring network, this paper proposed to transform the traditional system oriented and equipment oriented security evaluation into the evaluation method based on capability verification, and subdivided the video monitoring network into five capabilities—access sensing, internal and external sensing, threat blocking, data encryption and attack immunity. The corresponding collection indexes of each capability index were put forward. Using AHP to determine the weight of each evaluation index, and quantify each evaluation index. Finally, this model is applied to the inspection results of video monitoring network in two cities in 2018. The quantitative score can reflect the network security state of video monitoring network intuitively and scientifically.

Key words: evaluation index, video monitoring, capability verification, penetration test, AHP

CLC Number:

TP309

GAO Jian, WANG Kaiyue, HUANG Shuhua. Research on Security Evaluation Index System for Video Monitoring Network[J]. Netinfo Security, 2021, 21(12): 78-85.

Figures/Tables 11

References 18

[1]	YU Chenjun. Brief Discussion on the Security Construction of Public Security Video Network from the Angle of Classified Protection[J]. China Public Security, 2018, 17(7):178-179.
	于臣军. 从等级保护角度浅谈公安视频网安全建设[J]. 中国公共安全, 2018, 17(7):178-179.
[2]	GUO Wei, MIAO Rui. Analysis on the Security Construction of Public Security Video Transmission Network[J]. China Security Protection Certification, 2019, 18(4):29-32.
	郭维, 苗瑞. 公安视频传输网安全建设分析[J]. 中国安全防范技术与应用, 2019, 18(4):29-32.
[3]	YU Wei, MA Jingyu. Public Security Video Surveillance Construction Network Application Helps the Construction of Smart Cities[J]. China Public Security, 2017, 16(9):55-58.
	喻伟, 马井宇. 公共安全视频监控建设联网应用助阵智慧城市建设[J]. 中国公共安全, 2017, 16(9):55-58.
[4]	FU Xin, LIU Lin, ZHANG Fanzhong. Research on Information Security Evaluation Technology of Public Security Video Surveillance System Based on Classified Protection Evaluation[J]. Police Technology, 2016, 32(5):75-78.
	浮欣, 刘琳, 张凡忠. 基于等级保护测评的公共安全视频监控系统信息安全测评技术研究[J]. 警察技术, 2016, 32(5):75-78.
[5]	HE Xiaohua. The Construction Status of Public Security Video Surveillance in China in 2013[J]. China Public Security (Comprehensive Edition), 2013, 12(3):120-125.
	贺小花. 2013年我国公安视频监控建设现状[J]. 中国公共安全(综合版), 2013, 12(3):120-125.
[6]	CLARK K, TYREE S, DAWKINS J, et al. Qualitative and Quantitative Analytical Techniques for Network Security Assessment[C]// IEEE. Fifth Annual IEEE SMC Information Assurance Workshop, June 10-11, 2004, West Point, NY, USA. New Jersey: IEEE, 2004: 321-328.
[7]	HUANG Limin, WANG Hua. Multilevel Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Network Security[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2004, 23(4):510-513.
	黄丽民, 王华. 网络安全多级模糊综合评价方法[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 23(4):510-513.
[8]	REN Wei, JIANG Xinghao, SUN Tanfeng. RBFNN-based Prediction of Networks Security Situation[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2006, 42(31):136-138, 144.
	任伟, 蒋兴浩, 孙锬锋. 基于RBF神经网络的网络安全态势预测方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2006, 42(31):136-138,144.
[9]	KOTENKO I, STEPASHKIN M. Attack Graph Based Evaluation of Network Security[C]// CMS. 10th IFIP TC-6 TC-11 International Conference, October 19-21, 2006, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 216-227.
[10]	ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Qingxian. A Network Security Evaluation Method Based on Fuzzy and RST[C]// ICETC. 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, June 22-24, 2010, Shanghai, China. New Jersey: IEEE, 2010: 40-44.
[11]	BRUTZER S, HOFERLIN B, HEIDEMANN G. Evaluation of Background Subtraction Techniques for Video Surveillance[C]// IEEE. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20-25, 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA. New York: IEEE, 2011: 1937-1944.
[12]	YANG Jiaxing. Simulation Analysis of Complex Network Security Situation Assessment Model[J]. Computer Simulation, 2013, 30(8):289-292.
	杨家兴. 复杂网络安全态势评估模型仿真分析[J]. 计算机仿真, 2013, 30(8):289-292.
[13]	BIAN Nayun, WANG Xiaofeng, MAO Lin. Network Security Situational Assessment Model Based on Improved AHP_FCE[C]// IEEE. 2013 Sixth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence, October 19-21, 2013, Hangzhou, China. New Jersey: IEEE, 2013: 200-205.
[14]	ZHU Dan, XIE Xiaoyao, XU Yang, et al. Evaluation Method for Network Security Level Based on Cloud Model and Bayesian Feedback[J]. Journal of Shandong University, 2018, 53(1):53-62.
	朱丹, 谢晓尧, 徐洋, 等. 基于云模型与贝叶斯反馈的网络安全等级评估方法[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(1):53-62.
[15]	YANG Hang, JIA Yan, HAN Weihong, et al. Calculation of Network Security Index Based on Convolution Neural Networks[C]// ICAIS. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Security, July 26-28, 2019, New York, NY, USA. Switzerland: Springer, 2019: 530-540.
[16]	CHEN Weipeng, AO Zhigang, GUO Jie, et al. Research on Cyberspace Situation Awareness Security Assessment Based on Improved BP Neural Network[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(S2):335-337, 341. doi: 10.1063/1.31406 URL
	陈维鹏, 敖志刚, 郭杰, 等. 基于改进的BP神经网络的网络空间态势感知系统安全评估[J]. 计算机科学, 2018, 45(S2):335-337,341.
[17]	HUANG Yehua. Assessment Technology for Network Security Situation Based on Segmented Attack[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 50(3):489-491.
	黄晔华. 基于分段攻击的网络安全态势评估技术[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 50(3):489-491.
[18]	HAN Li, MEI Qiang, LU Yumei, et al. Analysis and Study on AHP-fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14(7):89-92,3.
	韩利, 梅强, 陆玉梅, 等. AHP-模糊综合评价方法的分析与研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(7):89-92.

	A1	A2	A3	A4	A5
A1	1	1/5	1/4	1/2	1/7
A2	5	1	3	4	2
A3	4	1/3	1	2	1/3
A4	2	1/4	1/2	1	1/3
A5	7	1/2	3	3	1

A1	A11	A12	A13
A11	1	4	5
A12	1/4	1	2
A13	1/5	1/2	1

A2	A21	A22	A23
A21	1	1/3	1/2
A22	3	1	2
A23	2	1/2	1

A3	A31	A32	A33
A31	1	1/2	1/5
A32	2	1	1/3
A33	5	3	1

A4	A41	A42	A43
A41	1	1/5	1/6
A42	5	1	2
A43	6	1/2	1