可见光通信物理链路的基准保密容量比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2020.05.008

信息网络安全 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 65-71.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2020.05.008

可见光通信物理链路的基准保密容量比较研究

丁举鹏¹^,^*(), 易芝玲², 王劲涛³, 阳辉³

^1. 新疆大学信息科学与工程学院信号检测与信息处理自治区重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830046
^2. 中国移动通信研究院,北京 100053
^3. 清华大学北京信息科学与技术国家研究中心,北京 100084

收稿日期:2020-03-15 出版日期:2020-05-10 发布日期:2020-06-05
通讯作者: 丁举鹏 E-mail:jupeng7778@163.com
作者简介:丁举鹏（1985—）,男,山东,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为可见光通信、无线光通信、自由空间光、光与无线融合等;|易芝玲（1957—）,女,台湾,高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为无线通信、绿色通信、5G&B5G移动通信等|王劲涛（1978—）,男,河北,教授,博士,主要研究方向为无线通信、可见光通信、光与无线融合通信等|阳辉（1967—）,男,广西,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为可见光通信、数字电视传输、电力线通信等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61401420);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金面上项目(2019D01C020);新疆维吾尔自治区全职引进高层次创新人才项目(042419004);新疆维吾尔自治区天池博士计划(04231200728);新疆大学自然科学基金(62031224624)

Comparative Research of Benchmark Security Capacity of Visible Light Communication Physical Links

DING Jupeng¹^,^*(), YI Zhiling², WANG Jintao³, YANG Hui³

^1. Xinjiang Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Signal Detection and Information Processing, School of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
^2. China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing 100053, China
^3. Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2020-03-15 Online:2020-05-10 Published:2020-06-05
Contact: Jupeng DING E-mail:jupeng7778@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在5G演进过程中,可见光通信的物理层安全问题逐渐受到关注与讨论。然而,现有研究范式尚局限于基于传统朗伯型LED光源的可见光通信保密链路的讨论,对于实际商用非朗伯光源下链路的保密特性,特别是非朗伯链路配置下的基准保密容量,尚缺少量化比较研究。针对上述问题,文章延伸了已有可见光保密链路建模方案;量化展示了室内环境下,典型非朗伯可见光保密链路的基准特性差异。量化结果显示,相比较传统朗伯波束情况,典型非朗伯波束可将基准保密容量的空间动态范围从0~10.78 bps/Hz压缩至0~6.40 bps/Hz,相应地基准保密容量均值从初始的5.25 bps/Hz减少至2.78 bps/Hz。因此,在设计及优化可见光通信保密链路过程中,应综合考虑光源多样波束特性对保密容量的影响,可将其作为潜在的优化维度。

关键词: 物理层安全, 可见光通信, 保密容量, 光波束, 非朗伯波束

Abstract:

In the process of 5G evolution, the physical layer security of visible light communication (VLC) is gradually earning attention and discussion. However, the current research paradigm is limited to the discussion of visible light communication secure link based on conventional Lambertian LED sources, and there is no quantitative comparative study on the link security characteristics of commercial non-Lambertian sources, especially the benchmark security capacity under non-Lambertian link configurations. In view of the above problems, this paper extends the existent VLC security link modeling scheme, and quantifies the benchmark characteristics of typical non-Lambertian VLC security links within typical indoor environment. The numerical results show that compared with the conventional Lambert beam, the typical non Lambert beams could compress the spatial dynamic range of the benchmark security capacity from 0~10.78 bps/Hz to 0~6.40 bps/Hz, and the relevant mean value is dramatically reduced from the original 5.25 bps/Hz to 2.78 bps/Hz. Therefore, in the design and optimization of the VLC links, the influence of diverse source beams on the secrecy capacity characteristics should be considered, which could be viewed as a potential optimization dimension.

Key words: physical layer security, visible light communication, security capacity, optical beams, non-Lambertian beams

中图分类号:

TP309

丁举鹏, 易芝玲, 王劲涛, 阳辉. 可见光通信物理链路的基准保密容量比较研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(5): 65-71.

DING Jupeng, YI Zhiling, WANG Jintao, YANG Hui. Comparative Research of Benchmark Security Capacity of Visible Light Communication Physical Links[J]. Netinfo Security, 2020, 20(5): 65-71.

图/表 5

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 17

[1]	HARALD H, LIANG Y, YUNLU W , et al. What is LiFi?[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015,34(6):1533-1544.
[2]	AMITAV M, ALI A, JING H , et al. Principles of Physical Layer Security in Multiuser Wireless Networks: A Survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2010,16(3):1806-1818.
[3]	MOSTAFA A, LAMPO L . Physical-Layer Security for MISO Visible Light Communication Channels[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2015,33(9):1806-1818.
[4]	MOSTAFA A, LAMPO L . Physical-Layer Security for Indoor Visible Light Communications [C]// IEEE. International Conference on Communications (ICC), June 10-14, 2014, Sydney, NSW. New York: IEEE, 2014: 3342-3347.
[5]	MOSTAFA A, LAMPO L . Pattern Synconfproc of Massive LED Arrays for Secure Visible Light Communication Links [C]// IEEE. International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), June 8-12, 2015, London, United Kingdom. New York: IEEE, 2015: 1350-1355.
[6]	MOSTAFA A, LAMPO L . Securing Visible Light Communications via Friendly Jamming [C]// IEEE. Globecom Workshops, December 8-12, 2014, Austin, TX, USA. New York: IEEE, 2014: 524-529.
[7]	CHEN Z, WANG X . A Method for Improving Physical Layer Security in Visible Light Communication Networks [C]// IEEE. Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), October 29-31, 2018, Paris, France. New York: IEEE, 2018: 1-5.
[8]	SUNGHWAN C, GAOJIE C, JUSTIN P . Securing Visible Light Communication Systems by Beamforming in the Presence of Randomly Distributed Eavesdroppers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2018,17(5):2918-2931.
[9]	ASHISH K, GREGORY W . Secure Transmission with Multiple Antennas I: The MISOME Wiretap Channel[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010,56(7):3088-3104.
[10]	ZHANG Jin . A Physical Layer Security Approach for Indoor Visible Light Communications[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019.
	张瑾 . 室内可见光通信物理层安全通信方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2019.
[11]	CHO S, CHEN G, JUSTIN P . Physical Layer Security in Visible Light Communication Systems with Randomly Located Colluding Eavesdroppers[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2018,7(5):768-771.
[12]	CHO S, CHEN G, JUSTIN P . Securing Visible Light Communication Systems by Beamforming in the Presence of Randomly Distributed Eavesdroppers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2018,17(5):2918-2931.
[13]	CHO S, CHEN G, JUSTIN P . Enhancement of Physical Layer Security with Simultaneous Beamforming and Jamming for Visible Light Communication Systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2019,7(3):2633-2647.
[14]	DING Jupeng, I Chih-Lin, XU Zhengyuan . Indoor Optical Wireless Channel Characteristics with Distinct Source Radiation Patterns[J]. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2016,8(1):1-15.
[15]	DING Jupeng, I Chih-Lin, XIE Ruiyun , et al. Actual Radiation Patterns-Oriented Non-deterministic Optical Wireless Channel Characterization [C]// Springer. Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition, August 11-12, 2018, Urumchi, China. Berlin: Springer, 2018: 517-527.
[16]	MORENO I, SUN H . Modeling the Radiation Pattern of LEDs[J]. Optics Express, 2008,16(3):1808-1819.
[17]	TOSHIHIKO K, MASAO N . Fundamental Analysis for Visible Light Communication System using LED Light[J]. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2004,50(1):100-107.

参数	取值
场景房间长L、宽W、高H	15.6 m、9 m、3 m
朗伯型光源阵列的朗伯指数m_L	1
单个LED平均光发射功率	150 mW
调制指数α	10%
光源阵列中LED数量	60?60
光源阵列1空间坐标	（2.6,4.5,2.5）
光源阵列2空间坐标	（7.8,4.5,2.5）
光源阵列3空间坐标	（13,4.5,2.5）
3组LED光源阵列俯仰角	-180°
3组LED光源阵列方位角	180°
接收器俯仰角	0°
接收器方位角	180°
接收器视场角θ_FOV	90°
PD探测器面积A_R	1 cm²
PD探测器响应度_r	0.54 mA/mW
合法接收者空间坐标	（7.8,4.5,0.85）
窃听接收者高度	0.85 m
透镜折射指数n	1.5
室内区域的平均噪声功率δ²	1.47?10^-13A²

可见光通信物理链路的基准保密容量比较研究

Comparative Research of Benchmark Security Capacity of Visible Light Communication Physical Links

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 17

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡蝶, 马东堂, 龚旻, 马召. 一种基于PUF的物理层安全认证方法[J]. 信息网络安全, 2020, 20(1): 61-66.
[2]	张涛, 刘樵, 李晖. 多天线系统中物理层安全问题研究综述[J]. 信息网络安全, 2016, 16(5): 9-14.
[3]	杨斌. 无线通信物理层安全技术研究[J]. , 2012, 12(6): 0-0.