基于存储形态及特征的HBase数据库灾难恢复机制研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2018.09.007

信息网络安全 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (9): 42-47.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1122.2018.09.007

基于存储形态及特征的HBase数据库灾难恢复机制研究

罗文华, 王志铭

中国刑事警察学院网络犯罪侦查系,辽宁沈阳 110035

收稿日期:2018-07-17 出版日期:2018-09-30 发布日期:2020-05-11
作者简介:
作者简介：罗文华（1977—）,男,辽宁,教授,硕士,主要研究方向为网络犯罪侦查、电子数据取证;王志铭（1993—）,男,山东,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为信息网络安全。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金[61471134];公安部技术研究计划[2017JSYJA10]

Research on Disaster Recovery Mechanism of HBase Database Based on Storage Form and Features

Wenhua LUO, Zhiming WANG

Cyber Crime Investigation Department, Criminal Investigation Police University of China, Shenyang Liaoning 110035, China

Received:2018-07-17 Online:2018-09-30 Published:2020-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

文章在解析以HBase为代表的NoSQL数据库系统架构基础上,对比传统灾难恢复机制,深入挖掘了数据随存储流程时间线的变化规律,实现了弱依靠甚至不依靠日志信息实现数据还原与数据恢复的机制,以规避传统灾难恢复的不足。将数据存储形态与特征纳入灾难恢复考量范畴,可以更为充分地理解记录间时序关系,弥补单纯依靠日志重放操作行为的不足,特别是在发生恶意操作或误操作的情况下,实现了还原数据的目的,并在分布式数据库删除数据恢复方面取得了较为满意的效果。

关键词: 云平台, 灾难恢复, 记录特征, 数据恢复

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the NoSQL database system architecture represented by HBase, compared with the traditional disaster recovery mechanism, it deeply explored the changing rule of the data with the storage process timeline, and realized the mechanism of data restoration and data recovery by relying on or even not relying on log information. To circumvent the shortcomings of traditional disaster recovery. By incorporating data storage forms and characteristics into disaster recovery considerations, we can more fully understand the timing relationships between records and make up for the inadequacies of relying solely on log replay operations, especially in the event of malicious operations or misoperations, the purpose of restoring data is achieved, and relatively satisfactory results are obtained in data recovery of the distributed database deletion.

Key words: cloud platform, disaster recovery, record characteristics, data recovery

中图分类号:

TP309

罗文华, 王志铭. 基于存储形态及特征的HBase数据库灾难恢复机制研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 18(9): 42-47.

Wenhua LUO, Zhiming WANG. Research on Disaster Recovery Mechanism of HBase Database Based on Storage Form and Features[J]. Netinfo Security, 2018, 18(9): 42-47.

图/表 3

参考文献 14

[1]	ALHAZMI O H,MALAIYA Y K.Evaluating Disaster Recovery Plans Using the Cloud[C]//IEEE. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium(RAMS), January 28-31,2013 , Orlando, Florida, USA.New York:IEEE,2013:37-42.
[2]	YANG Yixian, YAO Wenbin, CHEN Wei.A Comprehensive Review of Information System Disaster Recovery Technology[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,2010,33(2):1-6.
	杨义先,姚文斌,陈钊.信息系统灾备技术综论[J].北京邮电大学学报,2010,33(2):1-6.
[3]	KHANUJA H K, ADANE D S.A Framework for Database Forensic Analysis[J]. Computer Science & Engineering: An International Journal (CSEIJ), 2012, 2(3): 27-44.
[4]	ALDHAQM A,RAZAK S A,OTHMAN S H,et al.Ngadi, Conceptual Investigation Process Model for ManagingDatabase Forensic Investigation Knowledge[J]. Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2016, 12(4): 386-394.
[5]	CHOI J H,JEONG D W,LEE S J.The Method of Recovery for Deleted Record in Oracle Database[J]. Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology(JKIISC), 2013, 23(5): 947-955.
[6]	ADEDAYO O M,OLIVIER M S.Ideal Log Setting for Database Forensics Reconstruction[J]. Digital Investigation, 2015(12): 27-40.
[7]	ZHOU Jingzhe, CHEN Changsong.Analysis of Network Information Security Countermeasures for Cloud Computing Architecture[J]. Netinfo Security, 2017, 17(11): 74-79.
	周靖哲,陈长松. 云计算架构的网络信息安全对策分析[J]. 信息网络安全,2017,17(11):74-79.
[8]	YOON J S,JUNG D W,KANG C H,et al.Digital Forensic Investigation of MongoDB[J]. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security and Cryptology, 2014, 24(1):123-134.
[9]	CHOI J M,JUNG D W,YOON J S,et al.Digital Forensics Investigation of Redis Database[J]. KIPS Transactions on Computer and Communication Systems, 2016, 5(5):117-126.
[10]	DEAN F C,GHEMAWAT J S,HSIEH W C,et al.Gruber, Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data[J]. Transactions on Computer Systems, 2008, 26(2):205-218.
[11]	GAO X M,JUDY Q.Scalable Inverted Indexing on NoSQL Table Storage[D]. Indiana:School of Informatics and Computing, 2013.
[12]	CHEN Xilin,MA Ding.HBase Storage Structure Design for Weibo Information Analysis[J].Netinfo Security, 2016,16(9): 267-271.
	陈希林,马丁. 针对微博信息分析的HBase存储结构设计[J]. 信息网络安全,2016,16(9):267-271.
[13]	MENG Yongwei, HUANG Jianqiang, CAO Tengfei, et al.Design and Implementation of Hadoop Cluster Deployment Experiment[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2015(1):145-149.
	孟永伟,黄建强,曹腾飞,等.Hadoop集群部署实验的设计与实现[J]. 实验技术与管理,2015(1):145-149.
[14]	LUO Wenhua,WANG Jun,SUN Yuanyuan.Study on Multi-level Data Collaborative Analysis of Nodes Based on Cloud Server[J].Netinfo Security, 2018, 18(3):39-45.
	罗文华,王俊,孙媛媛.基于云服务端的节点多层次数据协同分析研究[J].信息网络安全,2018,18(3):39-45.

[1]	殷明, 贾世杰. 一种局域网中基于SSD的防范勒索软件攻击技术[J]. 信息网络安全, 2019, 19(9): 71-75.
[2]	罗文华, 王俊, 孙媛媛. 基于云服务端的节点多层次数据协同分析研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 0(3): 39-45.
[3]	周悦, 王威, 宋红波, 何泾沙. 云平台下数据完整性验证方案设计[J]. 信息网络安全, 2018, 18(11): 57-65.
[4]	李剑锋, 刘渊, 张浩, 王晓锋. 面向IaaS云平台的路由转发优化研究与实现[J]. 信息网络安全, 2017, 17(9): 10-15.
[5]	树雅倩, 付安民, 黄振涛. 基于云平台的移动支付类恶意软件检测系统的设计与实现[J]. 信息网络安全, 2016, 16(1): 59-63.
[6]	沈长达, 吴少华, 钱镜洁, 何广高. ReiserFS删除文件的恢复技术研究[J]. 信息网络安全, 2015, 15(9): 262-265.
[7]	沈长达;林艺滨;钱镜洁. HFS+删除文件恢复技术[J]. , 2013, 13(8): 0-0.
[8]	刘建军;熊道泉;黄政;黄步根. 存储卡视频文件恢复研究[J]. , 2013, 13(6): 0-0.
[9]	陶永红. 数据恢复实践与研究[J]. , 2013, 13(4): 0-0.
[10]	刘洋洋. 硬盘数据恢复技术探究[J]. , 2013, 13(2): 0-0.
[11]	何月;赵宪伟;徐大伟. 基于云计算数字取证的CGRS资源选择算法研究[J]. , 2013, 13(11): 0-0.
[12]	刘琼;叶猛. 基于SQLite的iPhone数据恢复方法研究[J]. , 2013, 13(11): 0-0.
[13]	穆祥昆;赵晨飞;霍英东;唐召东. 基于云架构的网络安全事件监测系统研究[J]. , 2013, 13(10): 0-0.
[14]	贺滢睿;陆道宏;李建新;徐云峰. 面向iPhone手机的电子数据取证分析[J]. , 2013, 13(10): 0-0.
[15]	陈石磊;宋志毅;蔡佳义;罗骎骎. 基于云计算的低冗余远程智能恢复系统的实现[J]. , 2012, 12(9): 0-0.

基于存储形态及特征的HBase数据库灾难恢复机制研究

Research on Disaster Recovery Mechanism of HBase Database Based on Storage Form and Features

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 14

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价